Heterogeneous LoRaWan deployment for application dependent IOT networks

Abstract

In this study, we present an application-dependent heterogeneous LoRa network. Previous studies on LoRaWAN and particularly studies that rely on the use of adaptive data rate to optimize the performance of the network are based purely on the path loss of the nodes in the network with the assumption that all nodes in the network have similar requirements in terms of data rate and latency. In a real-life full-scale deployment, this is unlikely to be the case as the current LoRaWAN deployment trend shows that practical implementations are service-based. This approach means that critical applications will suffer reliability issues since they will have to compete with non-critical services for the same resources. To address this problem, we propose a heterogeneous LoRaWAN that is capable of providing support for applications ranging from delay-tolerant to delay intolerant with improved reliability through preferential transmission parameter allocation. Our study shows that this approach can increase the probability of successful uplink transmission of the critical applications by up to 44 percent and for transmitting nodes within a 3 km radius of the gateway, heterogeneous LoRaWAN possesses a 20 percent higher uplink packet delivery rate in comparison with the homogeneous network at the cost of slightly higher energy consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Yegin et al., LoRaWAN protocol: specifications, security, and capabilities. INC, 2020.

U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, “Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 855–873, 2017, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320.

N. El-Rachkidy, A. Guitton, and M. Kaneko, “Collision Resolution Protocol for Delay and Energy Efficient LoRa Networks,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 535–551, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TGCN.2019.2908409.

F. Adelantado, X. Vilajosana, P. Tuset-Peiro, B. Martinez, J. Melia-Segui, and T. Watteyne, “Understanding the Limits of LoRaWAN,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 34–40, 2017, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613.

M. Bembe, A. Abu-Mahfouz, M. Masonta, and T. Ngqondi, “A survey on low-power wide area networks for IoT applications,” Telecommun. Syst., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 249–274, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11235-019-00557-9.

B. S. Chaudhari and M. Zennaro, Introduction to low-power wide-area networks. INC, 2020.

A. Woolhouse, “The Weightless standard,” 2016.

B. Dix-Matthews, R. Cardell-Oliver, and C. Hübner, “Lora parameter choice for minimal energy usage,” RealWSN 2018 - Proc. 7th Int. Work. Real-World Embed. Wirel. Syst. Networks, Part SenSys 2018, pp. 37–42, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3277883.3277888.

Semtech Corporation, “SX1272/3/6/7/8 LoRa Modem Design Guide, AN1200.13,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.rs-online.com/.

Sigfox, “Sigfox Technical Overview,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.disk91.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/4967675830228422064.pdf.

J. Schlienz and D. Raddino, “Narrowband Internet of Things Whitepaper,” White Pap. Rohde Schwarz, p. 42, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://cdn.rohde-schwarz.com/pws/dl_downloads/dl_application/application_notes/1ma266/1MA266_0e_NB_IoT.pdf.

M. Centenaro, L. Vangelista, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 60–67, 2016, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2016.7721743.

I. Blair et al., “Weightless-P System specification,” pp. 1–103, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://pro-bee-user-content-eu-west-1.s3.amazonaws.com/public/users/Integrators/929cb090-e779-401a-b06c-c629ff6b0fea/ap-cambridgestartuplimi/Weightless-P_v1.03.pdf.

A. Rahmadhani and F. Kuipers, “When lorawan frames collide,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM, 2018, pp. 89–97, doi: 10.1145/3267204.3267212.

T. Voigt, M. Bor, U. Roedig, and J. Alonso, “Mitigating inter-network interference in lora networks,” Int. Conf. Embed. Wirel. Syst. Networks, pp. 323–328, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.00688.

R. Abbas, A. Al-Sherbaz, A. Bennecer, and P. Picton, “Collision evaluation in low power wide area networks,” Proc. - 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intell. Comput. Adv. Trust. Comput. Scalable Comput. Commun. Internet People Smart City Innov. SmartWorld/UIC/ATC/SCALCOM/IOP/SCI 2019, pp. 1505–1512, 2019, doi: 10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00271.

S. Cui and I. Joe, “Collision prediction for a low power wide area network using deep learning methods,” J. Commun. Networks, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JCN.2020.000017.

LoRa-Alliance, “LoRa Specification,” LoRaTM Alliance, p. 82, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/rel-assets/ds-assets/uploads/knowledge-items/application-notes-for-the-internet-of-things/LoRaWAN Specification 1R0.pdf.

S. Li, U. Raza, and A. Khan, “How Agile is the Adaptive Data Rate Mechanism of LoRaWAN?,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2018 - Proceedings, 2018, pp. 206–212, doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647469.

D. Y. Kim, S. Kim, H. Hassan, and J. H. Park, “Adaptive data rate control in low power wide area networks for long range IoT services,” in Journal of Computational Science, 2017, vol. 22, pp. 171–178, doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.04.014.

V. Hauser and T. Hegr, “Proposal of Adaptive Data Rate Algorithm for LoRaWAN-based Infrastructure,” in IEEE 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud, 2017, pp. 85–90, doi: 10.1109/FiCloud.2017.47.

F. Cuomo, M. Campo, and A. Caponi, “EXPLoRa : EXtending the Performance of LoRa by suitable spreading factor allocations,” in IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) EXPLoRa:, 2017, pp. 1–8.

F. Van Den Abeele, J. Haxhibeqiri, I. Moerman, and J. Hoebeke, “Scalability Analysis of Large-Scale LoRaWAN Networks in ns-3,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2186–2198, 2017, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2768498.

K. Q. Abdelfadeel, V. Cionca, and D. Pesch, “Fair Adaptive Data Rate Allocation and Power Control in LoRaWAN,” 19th IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WoWMoM 2018. 2018, doi: 10.1109/WoWMoM.2018.8449737.

B. Reynders, W. Meert, and S. Pollin, “Power and Spreading Factor Control in Low Power Wide Area Networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017, pp. 1–6.

M. N. Ochoa, L. Suraty, M. Maman, and A. Duda, “Large Scale LoRa Networks : From Homogeneous to Heterogeneous Deployments,” in 2018 14th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 2018, pp. 192–199.

S. Garcia, F. D. Larios, J. Barbancho, E. Personal, M. J. Mora-Merchan, and C. Leon, “Heterogeneous LoRa-Based Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network Multiprocessor Platform for Environmental Monitoring,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 19, no. 3446, pp. 1–28, 2019.

M. El-Aasser, M. Ashour, and T. Elshabrawy, “LoRa Wide Area Network Pragmatic Heterogeneous IoT Applications, Deployment Using Different Spreading Factors,” pp. 327–338, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64217-4_36.

S. M. Dimitrov and D. M. Tokmakov, “Integrating data from heterogeneous wireless sensor networks based on LoraWan and ZigBee sensor nodes,” in 2020 29th International Scientific Conference Electronics, ET 2020 - Proceedings, 2020, pp. 13–16, doi: 10.1109/ET50336.2020.9238256.

R. Marini, K. Mikhaylov, and G. Pasolini, “LoRaWANSim : A Flexible Simulator for LoRaWAN Networks,” pp. 1–19, 2021.

M. Hata, “Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Services,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 1980, doi: 10.1109/T-VT.1980.23859.

LoRa Alliance, “LoRaWAN 1.0.3 specification,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://lora-alliance.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/lorawan1.0.3.pdf.

Published
2022-04-30
How to Cite
Agbolade, O., Dahunsi, F., & Oyetunji, S. (2022). Heterogeneous LoRaWan deployment for application dependent IOT networks. ITEGAM-JETIA, 8(34), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v8i34.798
Section
Articles