Editorial Policies

 

 

FREE ACCESS POLICY

 

Article Processing Charges (APCs): FREE.

 

Item Shipping Charges: FREE.

 

All articles in this magazine follow the Open Access Policy

 

Document of Declaration of Ethics and Expertise in Publication

 

 

 


PLAGIARISM POLICY


JETIA uses Plagiarism Checker by Grammarly software to screen incoming articles. If plagiarism occurs, the article is rejected and returned to the author.

 

 

PUBLISHING ETHICS FOR AUTHORS:

Plagiarism

Author (s) are not allowed to submit the same manuscript to ITEGAM-JETIA and other journals, nor is it allowed to submit articles already published. Plagiarism is not tolerated in any way, if identified, the article will be rejected.

Authors:

It is aimed at the individual who has made considerable academic contributions to scientific research, for example, someone who contributes significantly to the conception, design, execution, analysis and interpretation of data, participates in the writing, revision or revision of the manuscript for intellectual purposes. Content and approves the manuscript to be published. It should be noted that the content of the manuscript, in its entirety, as well as the respective translation into English carried out by a translator trained in the language, are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Redundant Publications:

Redundant publication refers to the publication of the same intellectual material more than once, by the same author. Suspected cases of sending redundant manuscripts will be rejected.

Conflict of interest:

There should be no conflict of interest between the authors of the article. Everyone must agree with the submission of the article.

THE JOURNAL HAS THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES:

For the submission process, authors are required to verify all items necessary for submission. Submissions that do not comply with the standards of the ITEGAM-JETIA journal will be returned to the authors.

- Complete all fields requested on the article submission page.

- All authors of the work must be correctly registered on the platform of the Magazine.

- The contribution must be original and unpublished, and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal.

- The submission file is in Microsoft Word format.

- The consulted authors must be properly cited and the URLs for the references informed.

- Figures and tables must be inserted in the text, not at the end of the document in the form of attachments / appendices.

- The text must follow the style standards and bibliographic requirements described in the Information for Authors and in the JETIA magazine template.

- Must be submitted as a Supplementary Document to the Authorization for Publication of Work

- The authorship identification of the manuscript must be removed from the file and from the Properties option in Word, ensuring the Blind Peer Review.

- They must be Respected to the norms of ethics of research with human beings according to norms in force.

- The manuscript must be in the English language.

- There should be no conflict of interest between the authors of the article.

PUBLICATION ETHICS FOR REVIEWERS AND EDITORIAL TEAM:

Confidentiality:

The editor and editorial staff of the journal should not disclose any information about a manuscript sent to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial consultants and the editor, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: 

Unpublished materials revealed in a submitted manuscript should not be used in an editor's research without the author's express written consent. Insider information or insights gained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

Editors must refuse (that is, ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board to review and consider) consideration of manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationships or connections any of the authors, companies or (possibly) institutions related to the works.

Publishers must require that all contributors disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication.

Readiness:

Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or who knows that its immediate review will be impossible must notify the editor quickly, so that there is no delay in the assessment.

The ITEGAM-JETIA journal follows the good ethics practices of publication by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).

 

 

EVALUATION PROCESS

 

Original Articles

 

The evaluation process adopted is by blind peer review.

 

Papers submitted for publication in the JETIA Journal begin the review process with various aspects such as content, language skills and quality. Initially, the Editorial Board verifies the relevance, quality and compliance with the submission of works. According to the instructions to the authors, a preliminary evaluation of the presented text is performed, as well as of its second stage. Check the writing in English for their acceptance. At the end of these comments it will be decided whether the paper can be sent to the reviewers or returned to the authors with proper guidance so that the changes are reworded and the paper re-submitted. It may also be declined for this first check prior to the sequence of reviews.

 

After the first review process, the process known as “double blind” is performed. This evaluation process is observed by the evaluators regarding the technical quality terms of the paper. Evaluators also note the originality and usefulness of the text content. For this evaluation, experts in each area are chosen based on the subject, making their contributions impartial and confidential, the results are received, the Editorial Board defines the response of the paper evaluation process, communicating any of the following responses. below:

They accepted;

Accepted with minor corrections;

New relevant corrections and revisions;

Rejected;

In case of controversy in the results of the reviewers, the article will be sent to a third reviewer.

 

They accepted

The document will be published as presented, there are no changes or corrections to the content except form or presentation of corrections, and then verify the correct use of the English language.

 

Accepted with minor corrections

The paper will be published after the authors make minor corrections as suggested by the reviewers. The Editorial Board after the corrected paper checks the writing in English again (if necessary). This latest version provided by the authors should be accompanied by changes in the Word Manual for both technical corrections and language changes.

 

New relevant corrections and revisions

The paper should be corrected according to the suggestions sent; Authors should resubmit the article for consideration by the reviewers and the reviewers will note whether the suggested corrections have been made. This new version of the article should be accompanied by changes in the Word Manual for both technical corrections and language changes; If the authors disagree with any correction in the Guide they should explain the changes using Word (or highlight the point regarding local correction), or if there is no general opposition the objection should be supported by an attached letter. 

Rejected

The paper is not recommended for publication, according to the reviewers' recommendations after review by the Editorial Committee. They often point the authors to the reason for rejection, reviewers' considerations may serve as a fresh starting point or new approach to research.